Page 105 - Working-and-ageing-Guidance-and-counselling-for-mature-learning
P. 105

3062_EN_C1_Layout 1  11/23/11  4:21 PM  Page 99







                                                                             CHAPTER 5
                                               Cognitive ageing in older workers and its impact on lifelong learning  99





                 medical challenges, it is possible they are more reluctant to participate in
                 lifelong learning due to emotional unavailability. Experimental evidence for this
                 hypothesis remains elusive; however Aldwin et al. (1996) found that 43% of
                 older workers (aged 43-54) reported job-related problems that cause stress.
                   Cognitive training through lifelong learning in the professional environment
                 could increase the cognitive reserve (Stern, 2009) by maintaining or improving
                 cognitive abilities thought to deteriorate with age. Complex job demands, which
                 require cognitive training in the occupational environment, could potentially be
                 beneficial for compensating for age-related cognitive decline (Andel et al., 2005;
                 Bosma et al., 2003; Shimamura et al., 1995). Recently, Gajewski et al. (2010)
                 explored this hypothesis by comparing the cognitive performance of older (aged
                 48-58) and younger workers (aged 18-30) employed either on an assembly line
                 or in quality protection, maintenance and service at a big manufacturing
                 company. Job demands of the groups differed significantly in daily job
                 requirements and complexity.  All participants were assessed on working
                 memory, task switching and error processing. Their results indicated that older
                 workers on the assembly line showed worse reaction times and increased error
                 rates in complex memory load conditions than those working in non-assembly
                 services. No differences were found in the low working memory load conditions
                 indicating that the more the cognitive load the less successful compensation
                 mechanisms in older workers with repetitive non-challenging jobs. Moreover,
                 error rates of older workers working in non-assembly services were in some
                 cases lower than those of the younger groups.
                   Most studies agree that older workers benefit from lifelong learning and
                 complex job demands by increasing their cognitive functioning and reducing
                 age-related deficits (Hansson et al., 1997; Schooler et al., 1999). Challenging
                 job demands can potentially protect older workers from cognitive impairments
                 and this effect appears to be independent of general intellectual ability (Bosma
                 et al., 2003). In a longitudinal study with 1 036 participants, Potter et al. (2008)
                 found there was an interaction between job demands and general intellectual
                 ability: workers who scored lower on intelligence scales in their early adulthood,
                 were benefiting more from intellectually demanding jobs. This finding was
                 independent of other factors such as years of education and gender.
                   Participating in intellectually stimulating activities during the life span
                 predicts cognitive decline in older adults. The notion of ʻuse it or loseʼ seems
                 to be reliably supported by cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
                 Continuous involvement of adults in intellectually challenging activities
                 increases plasticity of the brain and affects the structure and function of
                 cortical and subcortical areas positively. Behavioural data support the
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110