Page 10 - european-lifelong-guidance-policies-progress-report
P. 10

Executive summary


                 tion mechanisms. These can serve as vehicles     helping  to  inform  and  develop  lifelong  guid-
                 for  improving  coherence  and  avoiding  over-  ance policies and practices. However, there is
                 laps. They need to be complemented by similar    still a paucity of data relating to costs and ben-  Summary
                 mechanisms at regional and local levels.         efits, broken down for analysis by specific target
               •  Such mechanisms take very different forms in    group(s)  and/or  by  specific  types  of  interven-
                 different countries, not least in the balance they   tions. Lessons need to be learned from allied
                 adopt  between  communication,  co-operation     sectors  in  developing  more  robust  account-
                 and co-ordination, and between reactive, criti-  ability data.
                 cal and proactive approaches to their role.
                                                               Section  3  reports  on  EU  policy  developments
              Section 2.4 reports the work of Work Package 4 on   related to lifelong guidance. It outlines the compo-
            quality and evidence. Key conclusions include:   nents of the Europe 2020 Strategy which are relevant
                                                             to  lifelong  guidance,  including  its  headline  targets
               •  The balance between quality assurance and evi-  and flagship initiatives. Within this framework, rel-
                 dence should be strongly influenced by a small   evant priorities include:
                 number of agreed quality elements, criteria and
                 indicators for measurement that can be tested   •  Reducing early school-leaving.
                 and applied in practice, supported by examples   •  Increasing learning mobility.
                 of  possible  data,  in  the  five  areas  identified   •  Making VET more attractive.
                 in  the  Quality  Assurance  and  Evidence-base   •  Modernising higher education.
                 (QAE) Framework developed by ELGPN: prac-     •  Promoting  adult  learning  and  validation  of
                 titioner competence; citizen/user involvement;   non-formal and informal learning.
                 service  provision  and  improvement;  cost-ben-  •  Combating youth unemployment.
                 efits to governments; and cost-benefits to indi-  •  Implementing flexicurity policies.
                 viduals.                                      •  Fighting poverty and social exclusion.
               •  There  is  an  urgent  imperative  to  improve
                 knowledge and understanding of effective evi-  The key policy documents and actions are then out-
                 dence-based  policies,  including  quality-assur-  lined in detail, in relation to schools (Section 3.2),
                 ance  systems  and  accountability  frameworks.   VET  (Section  3.3),  higher  education  (Section  3.4),
                 Investments made in lifelong guidance systems   adult education (Section 3.5), employment (Section
                 and services must demonstrate more clearly the   3.6) and social inclusion (Section 3.7). Each section
                 added-value returns for individuals, communi-  includes comments on the involvement of ELGPN
                 ties and societies.                         and possible next steps.
               •  The  aims  of  quality-assurance  systems  and   Section 4 reports on the ELGPN evaluation strat-
                 mechanisms  are  to  improve  efficiency  in  ser-  egy and on the main evaluation results in relation to
                 vice  provision,  to  increase  institutional  finan-  five areas: the management of the Network; learning
                 cial accountability and to create transparency   outcomes from the thematic activities; the relevance
                 from the perspective of the citizen. The latter   of the ELGPN 2012 outputs; impact at national level;
                 is often neglected by both policy-makers and   and the ELGPN as a member-state-driven Network. It
                 service providers.                          notes that, while some suggestions for improvement
               •  In  many  countries,  quality-assurance  frame-  were  offered,  ELGPN  members  were  very  satisfied
                 works  have  evolved  which  contribute  to  the   with the management and operation of the Network
                 gathering,  analysis  and  presentation  of  data,   and the general outcomes of its work. They also com-


                                                           9
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15