Page 56 - european-lifelong-guidance-policies-progress-report
P. 56

Section 4: Evaluation


            erogeneous issues identified in the implementation   intended  for  use  in  developing  and  implementing
            of the Work Programme and to integrate them into   career  development  programmes  in  the  education
            a  coherent  package.  The  Resource  Kit  reflected  the   system  and  public  employment  services.  WP4  pro-
            main themes of the Work Programme and presented   duced  a  detailed  proposal  for  a  Quality-Assurance
            useful steps for developing a national lifelong guid-  and Evidence-base (QAE) Framework, plus a Careers
            ance system. Members saw it as a relevant updating   Service Impact Inventory to examine the impact of
            of the 2004 EU common reference tools for lifelong   career services at institutional level: these tools can
            guidance, taking into account the new Europe 2020   be  used  as  a  basis  for  developing  national  bench-
            priorities.  The  kit  illustrated  the  contextual  differ-  marks on lifelong guidance.
            ences between the countries, which were implicitly   The members indicated a number of ways in which
            integrated in its tools. However, some members indi-  they  planned  to  use  the  Resource  Kit.  Some  coun-
            cated that the Resource Kit was too general in nature,   tries will translate the tools into their national lan-
            offering limited practical solutions to the problems   guage. In some, the tools will be used by national
            policy-makers  were  facing  on  a  daily  basis.  Other   forums or working groups comprising policy-makers
            members felt that this was still work in progress, rep-  and  national  experts.  The  various  sections  of  the
            resenting an important first step towards preparing   kit  allow  countries  if  they  wish  to  choose  particu-
            a more elaborate tool for policy-makers and other   lar  fields  of  work  without  necessarily  dealing  with
            stakeholders to review existing lifelong guidance pro-  the whole national guidance system at once. Other
            vision in countries and regions.                 members indicated that the Resource Kit will be used
              It  should  be  noted  that  the  strong  element  of   in reviewing national lifelong guidance strategies, in
            collective  participation  in  the  production  of  the   national educational reforms, in defining priorities
            Resource Kit involved some compromises in terms   for national ESF projects, and in developing training
            of  technical  quality  and  consistency.  The  Network   programmes for guidance practitioners.
            consists of a heterogeneous group of national repre-
            sentatives with varying roles and professional back-
            grounds. This provides a rich range of professional   4.5  Impact at national level
            and  policy  perspectives,  but  these  may  not  always
            be applied evenly. For example, the selection of the   During its two first phases, ELGPN facilitated shar-
            national  case  studies  were  based  on  the  proposals   ing of good practices and mutual learning between
            of the Work Packages rather than on consistent and   European  countries.  One  of  the  goals  during  the   Evaluation
            agreed quality criteria. As a whole, the Resource Kit   2011-12 Work Programme was to strengthen impact
            represents  a  tangible  product  for  use  at  national   at national level.
            and  regional  levels  in  member  countries,  but  may   The  participating  countries  designate  their  repre-
            need improvement following field testing during the   sentatives in the network. The working assumption is
            2013–14 Work Programme.                          that each national delegation will include both gov-
              In the process of preparing the Resource Kit, the   ernmental  and  non-governmental  representatives.
            Work Packages developed other complementary tools   One of the goals in 2011–12 was to strengthen the
            to  support  its  implementation.  These  are  reported   national  representation.  As  in  the  previous  phases
            in  Annexes  5-8  of  this  report.  WP1  collected  data   of ELGPN, the member countries adopted different
            from  member  countries  to  develop  Guidelines  for   strategies  for  involving  relevant  ministries.  Of  the
            Career Management Skills Development, as well as   29 country delegations, 27 included a representative
            a description of success factors in the implementa-  of  the  education  ministry;  15  included  representa-
            tion of lifelong guidance policies: these outputs are   tion from the ministry of labour/employment. The


                                                          55
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61