Page 134 - Working-and-ageing-Guidance-and-counselling-for-mature-learning
P. 134

3062_EN_C1_Layout 1  11/23/11  4:22 PM  Page 128







                          Working and ageing
                      128  Guidance and counselling for mature learners





                         normal employment law. There are financial incentives to defer drawing the
                         State pension, and individuals are allowed to draw on occupational and State
                         pensions while continuing in employment. However, UK State pensions are
                         low by international standards (AVIVA, 2010), with a significant minority of
                         people supplementing these through more substantial company schemes.


                         7.3.  Shape of life course


                         Despite these changes, policy and public attitudes, still tend to see 60/65 as
                         the normal retirement age, and government statistics still use these to define
                         the working age population. This has been recently criticised in the report of
                         an independent national commission of inquiry into the future for lifelong
                         learning (Schuller and Watson, 2009).  The commission argued that the
                         traditional model of the life course, with youth ending around 20, and
                         retirement beginning at 60/65 fails to recognise the real nature of most
                         peopleʼs lives in the 21st century.
                           The commission proposed a redefinition in public policy based around a
                         four-stage model, with the life course divided at 25, 50 (the point after which
                         age discrimination begins to be powerful in the labour market, and ill health
                         drives some people out of work), and 75 (by which point most people are to
                         some degree dependent on others for some requirements of everyday life).
                         Table 7.1 compares the traditional and proposed models.

                         Table 7.1.  A new model of the life course

                                          0-20     21-25    25-50   50-65    65-75     75+

                          Current model   Youth          Adult/worker         Retired/pensioner
                          Proposed model   Extended youth  Adult/worker  Third age   Fourth age

                         Source: Schuller and Watson, 2009.

                           The commission argued that public policy, and statistical systems should
                         use the four-stage model because the traditional model:
                         (a)  fails to reflect how people live now. Most people now do not establish
                             themselves in full adult roles until their mid-20s, while most wish to (and
                             are capable of) continuing contributing to society well into their 70s;
                         (b)  produces dysfunctional imbalances in pressure across the life course. The
                             second phase puts extreme stress (evident in wellbeing studies) on
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139