Page 83 - Socially-responsible-restructuring-Effective-strategies-for-supporting-redundant-workers
P. 83

Socially responsible restructuring
                                                          Effective strategies for supporting redundant workers




                     employees can find alternative work (or other activity) without the need to seek
                     assistance  and  this is reflected in some of the other case studies. However,
                     overall usage was relatively high in the case of GKN in the UK, where only 8% of
                     those being made redundant chose not to take up the support available (Case
                     study  4). Reluctance to take up the individual support offered was even more
                     pronounced  in  the  Latvian  case  study where employees failed to embrace the
                     group support activities on offer and the psychological sessions were also poorly
                     attended. It is difficult to relate this to the eventual outcomes experienced by the
                     displaced workers and the choice of whether or not to use the support will be
                     influenced  by  the  state  of  the labour market and availability of alternative jobs
                     and how easily they can be filled by the displaced employees. It was evident that
                     re-employment outcomes had fallen in the current recession, forcing  more
                     employees to use the careers advice available to them.
                        Related to the provision of individual support was the effectiveness in the use
                     of group sessions where employees  were given careers support collectively,
                     though with some variations between case studies. In some of the UK cases, the
                     group sessions were introduced at the start  of  the  support  process  in  the
                     interests  of  providing  general  information on what individual support was
                     available and how it could be accessed. Success here was not only measured by
                     the  subsequent  take-up  of  individual  support, but also by the timing. These
                     events had to be held as soon as possible in the redundancy consultation period
                     because previous experience indicated it was essential to support employees as
                     much as possible before they left their employer and moved physically off site.
                     However,  the use of group sessions went a stage further in some cases. In
                     Siemens  (Germany),  the use of advice  and counselling in peer review format
                     proved effective in sharing problems and concerns and also ideas and advice on
                     employment and training opportunities in the wider labour market (Case study 8).
                        The value of employer networks in identifying job vacancies is an important
                     finding from the case studies. Conventional thinking would tend to suggest that
                     the PES provides the main route for vacancy information and, while this remains
                     an  important  route,  it operates alongside effective employer based methods of
                     identifying vacancies. In the case of BenQ Mobile (Germany), there was heavy
                     use  of jobs fairs to attract employers with vacancies to one place. Using the
                     relevant  employers’  association gave access to around 10 000 vacancies and
                     this  contributed  to  over  90% of the displaced employees finding jobs, mostly
                     permanent ones (Case study 2). Anglesey Aluminium in the UK invited employers
                     from a range of sectors, not just its own, to come to the site and interview the
                     workers  facing  redundancy  and this proved popular, even attracting overseas
                     firms, resulting in substantial re-employment (Case study 11).








                                                           77
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88