Page 39 - european-lifelong-guidance-policies-progress-report
P. 39

Section 3: EU Policy Developments


              of early school-leaving, particularly in terms of   aimed  at  reducing  early  school-leaving  is  an
              motivation.                                      important basis for improving strategies.
            •  Designing  CMS  curricula  and  relevant  assess-
              ment processes in order to avoid a ‘deficit per-  Learning mobility
              spective’  for  students  at  risk.  Are  portfolios
              relevant to this issue? How should they be con-  ELGPN work should include this topic in order to
              structed to be valuable for vulnerable groups of   provide  member  countries  with  support  for  the
              students? What steps can be taken to ensure the   implementation  of  the  Council  Recommendation
              right to privacy and to avoid penalising use of   Youth on the Move – Promoting the Learning Mobility of
              the portfolio for vulnerable students?      Young People (28 June 2011). This includes:
            •  The role of Public Employment Services (PES)
              in  preventing  ESL  for  students  at  risk:  how   •  ‘Encourage the provision of guidance to mobile
              to organise partnerships between teachers and    learners after their return on how to make use
              guidance  practitioners  within  PES  to  present   of the competences acquired during their stay
              information  about  labour  market  opportuni-   abroad’ (Council Recommendation, §6(g)).
              ties and the structure of qualifications needed;   •  ‘Make information easily accessible to all young
              the role of PES in relation to drop-outs (‘com-  people  regarding  learning  mobility,  for  exam-
              pensation’).                                     ple through centralised web portals and other
            •  Clarifying which institution should be respon-  web services, support centres, information and
              sible for school drop-outs who ‘fall out of the   counselling services. The use of internet-based
              system’.                                         services can also be helpful’ (Council Recom-
            •  Access to on-line services for students at risk of   mendation, §1(b)).
              ESL. What kind of support is needed, especially   •  ‘Support and enhance the visibility of contact
              for young people who do not have the skills or   points  where  individuals  can  obtain  infor-
              tools to access web-based services? What steps   mation  on  how  their  qualifications  can  be
              can  be  taken  to  involve  parents  and  provide   recognised and certified after their return from
   Policy
              them  with  the  basic  skills  to  access  internet   abroad’ (Council Recommendation, §7(d)).
              services so that they can help their children?  •  ‘Provide  disadvantaged  learners,  who  may  be
            •  The co-ordination of various guidance services   deprived of opportunities for learning mobility,
              and  co-operation  between  all  stakeholders    with  targeted  information  on  available  pro-
              including PES, social partners and social work-  grammes and support tailored to their specific
              ers as a crucial factor for prevention, interven-  needs’ (Council Recommendation, §8).
              tion and compensation of early school-leaving.   •  ‘Encourage  networking  between  the  relevant
            •  Measuring  the  quality  of  guidance  provision   organisations,  stakeholders  and  other  actors,
              for students at risk of early school-leaving. This   in  order  to  ensure  a  co-ordinated  approach
              should  be  a  priority,  given  the  social  conse-  to motivating young people’ (Council Recom-
              quences at stake, and the Europe 2020 target     mendation, §2(b)).
              objective.  The  Recommendation  asks  for  ‘the   •  ‘Improve the quality of information and guid-
              development of evidence-based and cost-effec-    ance on national, regional, and local mobility
              tive  policies’.  The  evaluation  of  the  effective-  opportunities and grant availability’ (Council
              ness and efficiency of existing policy measures   Recommendation, §1(a)).






                                                       38
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44