Page 116 - guidance-supporting-europe-s-aspiring-entrepreneurs-policy-and-practice-to-harness-future-potential
P. 116

Guidance supporting Europe’s aspiring entrepreneurs
                                                                Policy and practice to harness future potential





                         The Latvian example above also shows that the role of private businesses is
                     developing. They are still involved as sponsors and members of juries but more
                     and  more  companies are involved in such competitions by giving real-life
                     business challenges for students to solve. This is also the case with the Excitera
                     innovation challenge open to students at the  Royal  Institute  of  Technology  in
                     Sweden.  The  objective of the challenge is to bring together students and
                     researchers to work on projects proposed by companies. The competition is eight
                     weeks long and participating teams are made up of a maximum of three people.
                     In the Czech Republic a popular competition called Czech head is aimed  at
                     scientists, researchers and students (European Commission, 2008a).

                     4.3.2.   Dedicated programmes on building self-confidence and self-efficacy
                     The  entrepreneurial  activities of university students depend largely extent on
                     perceived  barriers  to  and  support for new venture creation (Volkmann et al.,
                     2009). A perceived lack of relevant experience and a lack of self-confidence are
                     two  reasons  often  cited  by students and new graduates for not engaging in
                     entrepreneurship after graduation (European Commission, 2008a,  p.  24).
                     Confidence  is  also  closely  linked to another important characteristic highly
                                                                           25
                     relevant to the entrepreneurship agenda, self-efficacy ( ). The primary reason is
                     that a highly efficacious student will have greater confidence in their own abilities
                     to accomplish a range of activities pivotal to the creation of a new venture. Self-
                     efficacy  also  is  concerned  with commitment to accomplishing goals, which is
                     necessary for novice entrepreneurs as most have to go through  times  during
                     which they need to persist in the face of adversity to convert abstract ideas into
                     marketable products and services (Vyakarnam, 2005).
                         Dedicated programmes and activities focused on building the confidence and
                     self-efficacy of HE students are still few. It is often expected to be the by-product
                     of many extra-curricular activities but is less frequently the primary focus; instead
                     many activities seek to build the skill base and raise awareness. The Enterprisers
                     programme is one of few exceptions (see Example 23). It is built upon values and
                     activities, which seek to cultivate self-efficacy of participants so that they will try,
                     learn and persist in the pursuit of  entrepreneurship  (Vyakarnam,  2005).  The
                     programme was jointly developed by Cambridge University in the UK and MIT in
                     the US, but is now offered also by universities in Australia, France, Germany and
                     Malaysia.


                     25
                     ( ) Self-efficacy refers to ‘people's judgments of their capabilities to organise and execute courses
                        of action required to attain designated types of performances’ to the extent that their ‘level of
                        motivation, affective states and actions are based more on what they believe than on what is
                        objectively true’ (Bandura, 1986 and 1997, in Vyakarnam, 2005).






                                                              110
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121