Page 137 - valuing-diversity-guidance-for-labour-market-integration-of-migrants
P. 137

Valuing diversity: guidance for labour market integration of migrants







                         Quality standards are sometimes used to certify practices or products, as in
                     the  +development  project,  in  Greece,  or  to  accredit  organisations,  as  with  the
                     National  Careers  Service  in  the  United  Kingdom,  which  applies  the  matrix
                               41
                     standard ( ) to subcontractors.
                         Other  monitoring  and  evaluation  methods  mentioned  were  informal
                     discussions, self-evaluation of staff, evaluation seminars and focus groups.


                     5.1.4.   Outputs of guidance for immigrant integration
                     Although outputs are indicated, they are frequently unreported, partly due to the
                     lack  of  systematic  monitoring  and  follow-up  mechanisms,  but  also  due  to  the
                     immaterial  and  not  (immediately)  accountable  nature  of  some  the  guidance
                     process outcomes. Many of the outputs are declared in an imprecise way: better
                     integration, higher employability, increased self-awareness and motivation, better
                     information,  better  job  and  geographic  mobility,  improvement  in  service
                     coordination.
                         There are, nevertheless, reported and measured programme impacts, which
                     include  rates  of  completion  of  programmes,  obtained  traineeships/internships,
                     successful  business  start-ups,  VET  and  education  enrolment,  qualifications
                     obtained  (after  training,  validation  or  recognition),  developed  skills,  job
                     placements,  coverage  rate  of  target  communities,  stability  of  job  placements.
                     Most of these outcomes require standardised measurement and registry systems
                     at the beginning and at the end of programmes, as well as in later periods.
                         Follow-up after the completion of programmes is a need acknowledged by
                     most of the promoters and national representatives contacted. This is connected
                     to the absence of standardised and shared national evidence-bases for guidance
                     activities. Frequently guidance activities will not be  well-monitored, even if they
                     are  entrenched  in  activities  which  have  adopted  structured  monitoring  and
                     accountability, such as education, training and employment services.
                         One example of an effort to develop more comprehensive evidence on the
                     effects of guidance on immigrants’ integration comes from the London  mayor’s
                     office. The Assembly Economic Committee recently published a report on models
                     of  interesting  policies  and  practices  to  inform  an  effective  approach  to  adult
                     information, advice and guidance  (IAG) design and to offer potential evidence-
                     based policy options for consideration. Eight key themes were identified by the



                      41
                     ( )  The matrix standard is a UK-based national standard developed by the former DfES
                         and the Guidance Council defining best practice in the delivery of IAG, focusing on
                         key  activities  relating  to  the  delivery  of  the  service  and  its  management
                         http://matrixstandard.com/the-standard/the-standard/ [accessed 3.4.2014].







                                                           127
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142