Page 83 - Professionalising-career-guidance-practitioner-competences-and-qualification-routes-in-Europe
P. 83

adequate academic capability would be trained in the necessary personal values, skills
                  and attitudes.


               5.6.  Responses to the consultation process


               The  competence framework was circulated for comment by respondents in 30 countries,
               along with a response questionnaire (see Annex 4). The overall structure of the competence
               framework received highly favourable comment, and was viewed as taking an approach that
               was easy to understand. One respondent (Poland) commented that it is ‘clear and simple,
               and might also be used by decision-makers at regional and national level … to allow them to
               understand the specific work of career guidance practitioners’.
                  Some respondents commented on the totality of the competences as being ‘too much’;
               however,  these  respondents also generally confirmed that all the competences were
               applicable  or desirable in their country. Some emphasised the extensive supervision and
               support that guidance practitioners would need. This comment arose particularly in countries
               such  as  Bulgaria  (GCDF  trainer), Romania and Slovakia, where training and workplace
               infrastructure are currently more limited. Other responses reflected the current development
               of career guidance practice in their country: for example, an emphasis on assessment and
               placement  in  the  Czech  Republic,  where career development activities such as ‘exploring
               new  perspectives,  forming  strategies  and  plans’ were viewed as ‘not required’, although
               desirable.
                  The consultation process identified a small number of areas where the language used had
               not been easily interpreted: such issues were addressed  during  the  revision.  Responses
               relating to use of the competence framework are covered in detail in Section 7.











































                                                              73
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88